首页> 外文OA文献 >The visitor effect in petting zoo-housed animals: Aversive or enriching?
【2h】

The visitor effect in petting zoo-housed animals: Aversive or enriching?

机译:宠爱动物园里的动物的访客效应:厌恶还是丰富?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two studies were carried out on the effect of visitors on mixed-breed goats, llama, and Vietnamese pot-bellied pigs housed in a petting zoo display within a safari park. In the first study we investigated the effect of the presence and density of visitors on the animals' behaviour and in the second, the effect of animal grooming by the visitors. We hypothesised that the animals' behaviour would be negatively affected by presence of visitors compared to periods of their absence, but this hypothesis was not fully supported by the data. Goat and llama behaviour was unaffected by the presence of the public, while the pigs showed decreased inactivity and social behaviour, both affiliative and aggressive, when visitors were present.All three study species exhibited increased levels of non-aggressive interaction with the public when visitor density was higher but the level of avoidance or aggression towards visitors was not dependent on density. The goats were less often in physical contact with other goats and less likely to be within proximity of a non-conspecific when visitor numbers were high, whereas the pigs showed decreased feeding, a behaviour that constituted a majority of their activity budget. Species differences were observed in the proportion of samples the study groups interacted in a non-aggressive manner with visitors, goats being most likely and llama the least likely to engage in this behaviour. In the second study visitors were provided with a grooming tool and asked to groom the animals, but no significant behavioural change was observed in either goats or pigs as a result. Visitors groomed goats, but not pigs, more than they interacted with them in non-grooming interactions, and goats, but not pigs, responded less to grooming as visitor density increased.Although significant behavioural changes in all three study species were associated with either visitor presence or density, the low levels of avoidance of visitors, visitor-directed aggression, or animal-directed aggression, suggest the welfare of the study animals was not profoundly impacted by visitor-related stimuli. Furthermore, there was no evidence that grooming by the public was enriching for the animals. The species differences reported here do suggest, however, that Vietnamese pot-bellied pigs and llama are more sensitive to visitor pressure than goats and particular attention to their welfare may be necessary when they are housed in petting zoo displays.
机译:进行了两项关于访客对野生动物园内宠物动物园展示中饲养的山羊,美洲驼和越南大肚猪的影响的研究。在第一项研究中,我们调查了访客的存在和密度对动物行为的影响,第二项研究了访客对动物进行修饰的影响。我们假设与没有动物的时期相比,来访者的存在会对动物的行为产生负面影响,但数据并未完全支持这一假设。访客在场时山羊和美洲驼的行为不受其影响,而猪表现出的不活跃和社交行为减少,包括亲和力和侵略性。三种研究物种均显示出访客与公众的非攻击性互动水平增加密度较高,但对访客的回避或攻击程度与密度无关。当访客数量很高时,山羊很少与其他山羊进行身体接触,并且不太可能靠近非特定山羊,而猪的饲喂量减少,这是其活动预算的主要部分。在研究组以非攻击性的方式与访客互动的样本比例中观察到物种差异,山羊最有可能参与该行为,而美洲驼最不参与。在第二项研究中,为来访者提供了美容工具,并要求他们对动物进行美容,但是结果没有观察到山羊或猪的行为发生明显变化。访客修饰山羊而不是猪的行为要多于它们在非修饰相互作用中与山羊的交互作用,而山羊而非猪则对访客的修饰的反应随访客密度的增加而降低。尽管在这三种研究物种中,显着的行为变化与任一访客相关存在或密度,回避者的回避水平低,游客导向的攻击或动物导向的攻击,表明研究动物的福利并未受到游客相关刺激的深刻影响。此外,没有证据表明,公众修饰为动物增色。但是,这里报道的物种差异确实表明,越南大肚​​猪和美洲驼比山羊对访客的压力更敏感,当将它们安置在动物园的动物园里时,可能需要特别注意它们的福利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号